September has always meant a new school year, but this one was different.
For the first time in my adult life, I was not standing in front of a class. I had left my job as an educator within international education.
Stepping outside of the system I once worked to strengthen has given me a clearer perspective. And one of the things I now have clarity on is this: schools don’t lose integrity all at once. They lose it one decision at a time.
Early in my career, I believed in the values printed on banners and repeated in staff meetings: fairness, agency, integrity. When a student was caught plagiarising work, we followed the policy. A report was filed and leadership was informed.
I thought we sent a clear signal that rules and consistency and, above all, integrity mattered.
The erosion of integrity in schools
Then I saw the things that followed after - the quiet meetings and parent phone calls. The policy wasn’t technically ignored, but its spirit was bent under pressure. The message became: “Rules can be bent when it is convenient.”
In the early days, these one-off cases felt tolerable, even justifiable. But over time, they became a pattern. Staff stopped reporting smaller incidents and quietly adjusted grading to avoid futile follow-up. When a case was raised, it was because the breach was so blatant that no one could miss it.
A few incidents were handled appropriately, but they were rare. By then the message was already clear. Students had learned they could get away with it.
Talk versus action
Years later, as a programme coordinator, I sat in a meeting where leaders unveiled a major initiative they said had been in development for years. None of us had heard about it until that morning.
Still, colleagues joined in good faith. They named strengths and risks. They asked sharp questions. For a brief moment, the room felt like the culture we were promised: honest, constructive, collaborative.
Then the director cut in with a reminder to “be positive”. After that, the air went out and good ideas didn’t stand a chance.
Again, what followed was silence. The initiative went ahead and subsequent meetings turned into performance. Colleagues waited for the safe moment to speak, offered reassuring nods and drifted to topics around the decision. Writing the meeting minutes was difficult because there was little substance to record.
Values go missing
Both moments taught me the same thing: schools rarely collapse in dramatic fashion. On the surface, everything looked fine. Students graduated, glossy reports were sent out, professional development ran on schedule.
But underneath, values were eroding. Fairness flexed depending on who asked. Outcomes began to matter more than process. Optics started to trump ethics.
The danger wasn’t villains at the helm. It was well-intentioned people making choices, step by step, that felt defensible in the moment - to avoid conflict, to protect a new hire, to keep morale steady. Words like “alignment” and “team player” smoothed things over, but they also blurred the lines.
You start to believe that the ends can always justify the means. Over time, good staff don’t leave because they dislike challenges; they leave because they can no longer reconcile the values on the wall with the values in use.
I have caught myself falling into the trap. A new colleague raised a concern about fairness and I heard myself say, “Look at the bigger picture. Is this the hill to die on?” He nodded. He understood.
I sat at my desk realising that I had passed along the same rationalisations that had once disappointed me. That was my wake-up call.
The lessons we teach children
Now, when I watch my own children head off to school each morning - one clutching a lunchbox, the other waving with sticky fingers - I worry less about their maths than about the lessons they will absorb from the adults around them.
If students grow up in systems where integrity is negotiable and dissent is recast as disloyalty, they won’t just lose faith in schools. They will lose faith that their voices matter at all. And once that happens, cynicism becomes a survival skill.
If there is a way through, it isn’t grand. It lives in the day-to-day: name the value at stake, state decisions plainly and make space for challenge without penalty.
We can keep ourselves honest by asking: what value is at stake here and would I make the same call if no one were watching? Where have optics crept in and processes been overlooked? Because in the end, the means are the ends.
The author is a former international school teacher and programme coordinator
You can now get the UK’s most-trusted source of education news in a mobile app. Get 91 magazine on and on
