91

Please consent to cookies to view content.

' ); iframeDoc.close(); } } } } } const observer = new MutationObserver(switchSrc); observer.observe(document.documentElement, { childList: true, subtree: true, }); })();

91

Last updated

27 July 2026

png, 161.49 KB
png, 161.49 KB
pdf, 910.27 KB
pdf, 910.27 KB
docx, 207.67 KB
docx, 207.67 KB
pdf, 91.56 KB
pdf, 91.56 KB
pdf, 121.94 KB
pdf, 121.94 KB
pdf, 47.46 KB
pdf, 47.46 KB

Complete EE breakdown – 4,000 words, 34 marks, Grades A-E. All five assessment criteria decoded with mark bands and what earns full marks.

Research question development – Four tests of a good RQ (specific, researchable, subject-appropriate, original). Templates and strong/weak examples for all 6 subject groups: Language & Literature, Language Acquisition, Individuals & Societies, Sciences, Mathematics, The Arts, plus World Studies (interdisciplinary).

Writing process – Phase-by-phase plan from topic selection to final submission. Critical strategy: write body → conclusion → introduction (not the other way around). Body paragraph structure: claim → evidence → analysis → link to RQ.

Critical thinking (Criterion C – 12 marks, 35% of total) – Four techniques: source evaluation, weighing competing evidence, acknowledging limitations, counter-argument integration. Moving from satisfactory (6-8 marks) to excellent (11-12).

RPPF guide – Three reflections with weak vs strong worked examples. What each reflection should contain. Why “I read three articles” earns 1-2 marks but genuine reflection on changed thinking earns 5-6 marks.

Subject-specific guidance – History (historiography required), Economics (theory + data), Biology/Chemistry (experimental component, minimum rigour), Mathematics (beyond syllabus), plus common pitfalls for each.

Supervisor guide – Three required sessions, what is permitted vs not permitted, predicted grade, timeline. No sentence-level correction, no rewriting sections, no completing RPPF for students.

Common error register – Most penalised mistakes with specific fixes: RQ as statement not question, literature review instead of analysis, conclusion not answering RQ, RPPF as activity diary.

Student profiles – Four profiles (expert weak on argument, strong argument thin evidence, over word count, disengaged) with targeted prescriptions.

Pre-submission checklists – Criterion-by-criterion verification before final upload. Final self-test: read only introduction and conclusion – do they match?

Download now – complete EE guide for students and supervisors.

#IBDP #ExtendedEssay #EE #TOK #RPPF #ResearchQuestion #CriterionC #CriticalThinking #HistoryEE #EconomicsEE #BiologyEE #ChemistryEE #MathematicsEE #WorldStudies #SupervisorGuide #IBcore #BonusPoints #Assessment2025

Creative Commons "Sharealike"

Reviews

Something went wrong, please try again later.

This resource hasn't been reviewed yet

To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have downloaded this resource can review it

to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions.
Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch.