Get the best experience in our app
Enjoy offline reading, category favourites, and instant updates - right from your pocket.

Why Ofsted’s framework won’t work for history teachers

Ofsted’s approach to ‘knowledge’ simply doesn’t wash in historyÌýand vocational subjects, writes Sam Jones
12th September 2019, 3:39pm

Share

Why Ofsted’s framework won’t work for history teachers

/magazine/archive/why-ofsteds-framework-wont-work-history-teachers
Ofsted's New Framework: Why It Won't Work For History Teachers

There's a lot to like in Ofsted’s new inspection framework. I agree with Ìýthat a firm grasp of your subject is vital to great teaching and therefore like the emphasis on knowledge, especially updating subject knowledge.

I often work with vocational knowledge and preparation, and not knowing an industry’s practices and expectations can leave students’ unprepared to meet its challenges. I was therefore reallyÌýpleased to see consideration of updating teachers’ knowledge as part of the new framework.

There were, however, some elements that pleased me less – in particular, howÌýOfsted conceptualised knowledge.ÌýThe frameworkÌýreads to me as if "knowledge"ÌýwereÌýone thing:Ìýthat the kinds of knowledge you teach in physics or biology should be treated the same way as that needed for historyÌýor plumbing.Ìý


±·±ð·É²õ:ÌýWhat the new Ofsted inspection framework will look like in FE

±Ê°ù´Ç´Ú¾±±ô±ð:ÌýMeet Sam Jones: Star teacher and FE research pioneer

Background:ÌýOfsted reveals FE research reference group


This seems to suggest to meÌýthat Ofsted needsÌýto do a bit of thinking about the structure of the types of knowledgeÌýtaught across our education system.

The construction of knowledgeÌý

(what he calls "discourses"): the first is vertical, the second is horizontal.ÌýThe vertical discourse has two structures within it – hierarchical and horizontal.

It's this hierarchicalÌýknowledge thatÌýOfsted privileges. Hierarchical knowledge is like Lego;Ìýit builds on itself working towards overarching theories that explain and tie together the knowledge studied. It's a triangular-shaped knowledge structure and is frequently seen in the metaphor used in the "quality of education"Ìýsection of the framework.

"Ìýand "is designed to help learners to remember in the long term the content they have been taught and to integrate new knowledge into larger concepts".Ìý

Both of these statements appear to assume knowledge is vertically structured. But what if you teach history or plumbing, subjects that have a horizontal knowledge structure or discourse?

Horizontal discourse is like orange segments: segmentation means that knowledge does not build vertically because it doesn’t have principles that integrates the knowledge.Ìý

Horizontal knowledge structuresÌýwork out rather than up and is tied together by specialist language and ways of thinking. For example, knowing about the reasons for Magna Carta does not help you understand attitudes towards poverty in the 1930s, neither does knowing how to solder a joint help you to understand how to install a U-bend successfully.ÌýBecause these knowledges are constructed differently they necessitate different pedagogical approaches. Horizontal knowledge structures need the development of languages and ways of conceptualising the world.ÌýHorizontal knowledge structures require modelling and enactment.Ìý

Favouring one type of knowledgeÌý

Therefore, it follows that privileging one knowledge, the hierarchical, may inhibit the development of useful pedagogies and curricula for horizontal discourses and knowledge structures.ÌýFor example, when considering teaching, we are advised that "teachers present subject matter clearly, promoting appropriate discussion about the subject matter they are teaching".

I'm concerned that Ofsted isÌýlooking for vertically framed discussions that "build", which mayÌýresult in forcing knowledge into frameworks that just don’t fit in, and, in doing so distortÌýthe knowledge and pedagogies.Ìý

I'm also worried that this mindsetÌýignores the beauty of performance. :

"Charles begins by measuring and marking the 16-inch increments on the horizontal boards, and then lays out the vertical studs accordingly.ÌýHe measures again. Then he begins nailing the studs in place, driving in one nail, then another. Stopping occasionally to check with his eye or a framing square the trueness of the frame."

This demonstrates bodily positioning, muscle control, tool use, measuring by eye and equipment thus embodying the values of a craftsman.ÌýWhat questions can you ask that can give a fuller answer than this?

And so, I'm giving Ofsted a "requires improvement"ÌýjudgementÌýfor its use of knowledge. They demonstrate a good understanding of the overall importance of subject knowledge, but perhaps an insufficient understanding of the types of knowledge taught.Ìý

Sam Jones is a lecturer at Bedford College, founder ofÌýFE Research Meet and was FE teacher of the year at the 91¶¶Òõ FE Awards 2019

Want to keep reading for free?

Register with 91¶¶Òõ and you can read five free articles every month, plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Register with 91¶¶Òõ and you can read five free articles every month, plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £4.90 per month

/per month for 12 months

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £4.90 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all 91¶¶Òõ magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £4.90 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all 91¶¶Òõ magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared