This summer’s A-level and GCSE results once again confirmed what families, teachers and communities across the North East have known for years: our students are working harder than ever and our teachers are performing miracles - but miracles are not a sustainable education policy.
For all the talent and determination in our region, the data tells a stark story. At A level, just 22.9 per cent of North East students achieved top grades (A/A*), compared with 32.1 per cent in London. At GCSE, only 17.8 per cent secured grades 7-9, compared with 28.4 per cent in the capital.
These aren’t marginal differences; they represent thousands of lost opportunities every year. And half a decade after promises of “levelling up”, the gaps are widening, not closing.
The instinctive response is often to blame schools, teachers or even students themselves. That narrative is wrong, and dangerously so.
The truth is simpler and harder: this is a system problem, not a schools problem. Unless national policy finally reflects that reality, these inequalities will persist for another generation.
Deprivation that hits harder - and lasts longer
The barriers facing disadvantaged children in the North East begin long before they sit an exam paper.
By age four, gaps in language, communication and social skills are already entrenched. Cuts to Sure Start, fewer health visitors and fragmented early years provision mean too many children start school already behind their peers.
From there, the challenges multiply. More than 32 per cent of North East pupils are eligible for free school meals, the highest in the country, compared with 24.6 per cent nationally - and in some areas, it’s over 40%.
Our region also has the highest SEND rates in England (15.5 per cent vs 14.2 per cent nationally), yet we face severe shortages of mental-health support, educational psychologists and early-intervention services. Schools are left carrying responsibilities they cannot, and should not, manage alone.
Crucially, deprivation in the North East is different to deprivation in London. In our region, it is often long-term and multi-generational, meaning its impact on outcomes is far more severe.
While London has higher absolute numbers of disadvantaged pupils, fewer fall into the “high‑impact” category; just 33 per cent compared with 84 per cent in the North East, rising to over 90 per cent in areas like County Durham.
Applying the same policies to both regions ignores these realities, and it’s one of the reasons the gap between them keeps widening.
White working-class pupils: a national blind spot
The disadvantage gap is universal, but nowhere is it felt more sharply than among white working-class pupils, the largest demographic in the North East.
Nationally, just 19 per cent of disadvantaged white British pupils achieve a “strong pass” in English and maths at GCSE, and only 16 per cent progress to higher education.
Here, the picture is even bleaker because our cohort mix amplifies the disadvantage penalty.
This isn’t about ambition. It isn’t about teaching quality. It’s about policy failure; a system locked in muddled thinking and clinging to one-size-fits-all solutions that simply don’t work in areas like ours.
The impact of attendance
You cannot teach pupils who aren’t in school. Since the pandemic, secondary absence in the North East has jumped from 5.5 per cent to almost 9 per cent, and persistent absence now affects nearly one in five pupils. Unsurprisingly, where absence is highest, progress is lowest.
A funded, multi-agency attendance strategy is essential. Without it, every other reform will fail.
It would be easy to despair, but the evidence shows this can be changed. At the turn of the millennium, London had some of the worst educational outcomes in the country.
Sustained investment, a place-based “London Challenge” strategy, and coordinated cross-agency work transformed outcomes.
But London’s story is not the North East’s. Our demographics, local labour markets and infrastructure are different. Copying London’s policies without adapting them to our context is doomed to fail.
Instead, we need a cradle-to-career strategy:
- National frameworks that recognise regional realities and invest where disadvantage hits hardest.
- Rebuilding local support infrastructure around schools - from Family Hubs to CAMHS to SEND services.
- Delivering parity of esteem for vocational pathways, linked to real economic opportunities.
- A multi-agency attendance plan to stop pupils falling out of education altogether.
Above all, government must accept reality: our teachers are already delivering excellence, and our students are already striving.
Without urgent, tailored action, the postcode lottery will continue to dictate futures. And that is a national scandal.
Chris Zarraga is director of Schools North East
Discover the latest insights into the education landscape in the North East at the ,. This year’s theme, Rebooting Education: The Future of Our Region Is in School, highlights the pivotal role schools play in shaping tomorrow.
The Summit brings together school leaders to connect, share expertise and celebrate the vital impact they have on the region’s education.
