A few months ago, I was teaching a lesson on democratic participation.
The class had been discussing the history of voting rights and how different groups had fought to be included in the political process. We had been looking at suffrage movements and the long struggle to expand the franchise.
At one point a student paused and asked a question that stopped the room.
“If democracy is so important,” they said, “why can’t we take part in it yet?”
The class fell quiet for a moment. It was a simple question, yet a revealing one.
At a time when the government is planning to , this question captures a tension that many teachers will recognise: the gap between learning about democracy in school and being able to practise it in real life.
Lowering the voting age
Schools already play a central role in shaping how young people understand civic life. In classrooms, assemblies and student councils, students encounter the everyday dynamics of institutions. They see how decisions are made, how authority operates and how collective responsibilities are negotiated.
In subjects such as politics, history or citizenship, they also study the principles of democratic participation.
They debate public policy, examine the development of voting rights and explore the responsibilities that come with citizenship. Discussions about public issues, elections and political ideas are now common in many classrooms.
In other words, young people are already being prepared for democratic life.
This is why the current debate about is so interesting from a school perspective. Much of the public discussion has focused on whether 16-year-olds are mature enough or informed enough to vote.
Those questions matter. Another question, however, may be equally important for educators.
If we expect students to learn democracy in school, should we also trust them to practise it there?
Evidence from countries that have lowered the voting age suggests that participation at 16 can strengthen democratic engagement rather than undermine it.
For the 2014 Scottish independence referendum, turnout among 16- and 17-year-olds was estimated at around 75 per cent in post-referendum survey research, significantly higher than turnout among 18- to 24-year-olds.
Putting learning into practice
One explanation is that first experiences of voting matter. When people vote for the first time while still embedded in supportive environments such as schools and families, participation is more likely to become habitual.
When the first opportunity to vote arrives during the upheaval of early adulthood, however, when young people are moving away from home or starting work or university, it is easier to miss that first moment of participation.
From a classroom perspective, the most striking aspect of the current system is the disconnect it creates between civic education and civic participation.
Students study democratic institutions and political participation in school, yet remain excluded from the very process those lessons describe.
That contradiction does not go unnoticed by young people.
Simon Lightman is a secondary school teacher in England
You can now get the UK’s most-trusted source of education news in a mobile app. Get 91 magazine on and on
